On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > As a general rule, any protocol that contains a component that may be > > subject to variation in the field needs an IANA registry. Since we are > going > > to have multiple automatic validation processes we will be required to > have > > a registry even if there is only one entry at first. > > ACME has always been structured with a registry in mind; the IANA > considerations just haven't been written up :)
Thats fine, I just wanted to make sure that this hadn't been erased during the discussion.
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
