On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with Tony here. I'm not familiar with IETF processes, but I > assume adopting something even as a working draft conveys some > preliminary notion of acceptance. Is that correct? If so, we should aim > to fix this large outstanding bug before adopting the current draft. > So, this is a common misconception. Adopting a draft doesn't mean you think it is done or even that it has no known issues; it's a statement by the working group that this is a starting point. Think of it like picking a github repo to work from--you want concrete text to present diffs to, and picking a draft to work from lets you do that. I believe the group so far believes that the diffs should be against draft-barnes; that's all this means. regards, Ted
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
