On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Ilari Liusvaara < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:27:09AM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > +1 > > > > I would much rather block the entire class of attacks rather than spend > any > > time working out if there is a way to do this with ECC based keys. > > FYI, one of the five proposals for CFRG signatures: > - One is definitely vulernable (and key-checking won't help). > - Two are definitely not vulernable. > - Two I don't know. > > So good idea to just block the attack. > I hadn't actually thought of using this as a discrimination function on the CFRG algorithms. It is as good as anything else.
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
