On 28 September 2015 at 13:43, Ted Hardie <ted.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure this quite right. If I understand the proposal correctly, when > a client sees http-01 but understands only http-00, the idea that one is > related to the other has no meaning, as the client can only respond to > challenges when type and version match what it has code for, right?
A-00 + B-01 is a bit odd, but if the server wants to support multiple versions, then it can enumerate all the combinations. Otherwise, A-00 and A-01 are treated as completely different challenges in every regard. I think that keeps it simple. An implementation that does only one version (the sensible thing at this point) doesn't have any complexity to swallow. An implementation that supports multiple versions should probably just do the simple thing. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
