On 10/29/15 10:09 AM, Hugo Landau wrote: An interesting post in general, but to fill in one particular gap:
I believe the trans WG has at least contemplated some form of DNSSEC transparency by extending the Certificate Transparency system which would be a nice addition, though it doesn't seem like it's going to become a reality anytime soon.
It's something that's percolating along in the background. We don't yet have a draft that's mature enough to convince us that there's something that can be done that would be useful, scales, and demonstrates that problems around things like zone cuts can be solved, but there's enough interest that it's likely something will happen. It's going to be discussed briefly on Monday. Melinda _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
