I'd prefer that currently, way better than having a lot of different specs with only minimal differences.
Bryan Livingston <bryanlivings...@gmail.com> schrieb am Do., 19. Nov. 2015 18:56: > We could have the ACME server look for both a .txt and extensenless > answer, if we'd rather not create an http-02 type at this time. > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Niklas Keller <m...@kelunik.com> wrote: > >> 2015-11-18 21:05 GMT+01:00 Bryan Livingston <bryanlivings...@gmail.com>: >> >>> I was thinking that the Authorize Challenge token generated by the >>> server could have a .txt appended to it. Would the clients just work in >>> that case, and maybe not need to create a new challenge type? >>> >> >> No, that's not compatible, because the token is base64url encoded, that >> doesn't include dots. >> >> Regards, Niklas >> > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
