On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:01:04PM -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > Again, I think you are missing the real problem here. Let us say we have a > new protocol to run over port 666 that is actually a Web service under the > covers. > > Hosting provider has a host that supports the following Web Sites that > belong to different parties: > > example.com > malicious.com > > The hosting provider allows any form of executable to run on the host > (10.6.6.6) that does not interfere with apache which has 80 & 443 reserved. > [This is typical]
Are there any typical hosting environments in which such executables can bind to port 666, while being unable to tear down and replace the service that's bound of 443? What are they? -- Peter Eckersley p...@eff.org Chief Computer Scientist Tel +1 415 436 9333 x131 Electronic Frontier Foundation Fax +1 415 436 9993 _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
