-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On 21.01.2016 15:13, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> I am not at all familiar with the processes in an IETF WG. What >> is the way forward to get my proposal either into the protocol or >> officially dismissed? > > This is the way it works. :) People post to the mailing list and > there's discussion. At some point, the chairs will see if there is > consensus to do it. > > So things are working as designed. It's informal and a bit messy. > > What might help focus discussion is if you made a pull request with > your specific wording changes. I gave it a shot: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/82 I will appreciate any feedback on that proposal. best regards, jwi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWub2+AAoJEMBiAyWXYliKdPQP/RyadYaVYunmFn9/TKelN3CO ewdgsnbneS7KZ8TbhDEi788N9w2t1EIUBuqmEtSmUy3SYbsSg2ufVFYIGn9LSsL1 GT0XpNQ16f/+x8qgNGGSyV9ZddORo4dq20Lkf5TTvj8TTuJOzGrQWIq9tKk7/Bcf ytXVqQpAhZd933RSRaBfFfxFv2Yq4dcq9WiccLurtmTLOXDbUXWK1Ij1WEVlMNeD 9R7V9DRDIFtItEG/6haMqzNECeFeP+GDE85JqzK03aRxjE994Rp24Cb6VnloWvxH tFxm+olRMmB7YqyQ3+Xk0CXMHqtnqTjVQzuQaqVVrSLMXB0200okmcTzcNbLGWpk DCzOel2iVNtRxb/R4Oaw6TAPLj7UQZQD2n2GaqJL4bJVHttsFrW8AW0PY3MWurGr 0xCyleVyGeJGcqVF6c4x25chcN35sT1uP+JoqJufomHlF5Mp7zY8r8hVPzLHic38 Ym+nPGebs35x7uKgtwyctx89v5d0NoN3HzOu0nsvDGizyLtmVxKWxUhOcsKL5rfX N/6FdW7aCo0qqtqlSt+OYTiBAeknktG5vV6N90o5NEvv8WhOPPGSPSJ/cmwWyKlD jymlTNu0XUIH6kq+enby1/f4cgwbC1srTAulz68SDz67B8V71EeI0O50XLV91Zq+ Qpm9rpOURUoG1KAnlDnK =YzqS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
