On 7/20/16, 11:32 AM, "Yaron Sheffer" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi Carl, > >I think this could work, but I believe there are use cases >(specifically, CDNs) where people do not want to advertise the delegation.
I favor solutions where the relying party can be aware of the delegation if they want to be. > >Besides, I am personally averse to tweaking X.509. IMO it could make >standardization much more difficult. Maybe to the certificate issuance process, but for general use existing clients should just work out of the box. > >Thanks, > Yaron _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
