On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:54 PM, James Cloos <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> "TH" == Ted Hardie <[email protected]> writes: > > TH> The first is that control > TH> of a specific label has no easily generalized implication about > TH> administrative control of subsidiary labels. > > Which is why we have publicsuffix. > > The language should note that a public suffix does not get to do this. > > But everything else should get to. (Even the examples Rich noted, > unless any of them are in the publicsuffix db.) > > Hi Jim, The DBOUND group I referenced is working on a dns-based distributed successor to the public suffix list (see the charter here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dbound/charter/). The problem is the same. regards, Ted > -JimC > -- > James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6 >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
