On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I’ve posted the minutes here:
>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-acme
>>
>>
>>
>> Please review them.
>>
>>
>>
>> At the meeting, we came to consensus on several items, summarized here:
>>
>> * support both old and new 'applications' flow
>>
>> * Add version into protected payload
>>
>> * For issue 157, decided to return 302
>>
>> * drop Challenge; if we need OOB Challenge, we can add it back later.
>>
>> * verify sig_new(M,sig_old(M)) – Richard will be bringing this up to the
>> list, shortkly
>>
>> *  For 156, keep nonces
>>
>
> I seem to recall also agreeing to close #156, since nonces are not a
> scarce resource for servers, but I don't see this reflected in the
> minutes.  Any objections to that?
>

This is my understanding of the discussion in Berlin as well

-Ekr


>
>
>>
>>
>> Here’s the summary of action items:
>>
>> * Russ to draft a paragraph or couple sentences on replacement key
>> operational considerations (Richard will coordinate with Russ)
>>
>> * Request to the mailing list "hey, if you have a post-v1-WGLC, tell us
>> or this may not exist further!"
>>
>>
>>
>> That last item deserves some more explanation. We expect to enter WG last
>> call before IETF-97 in Seoul in November.  If there are items you think we
>> should work on after that, please bring them up here once we enter WGLC;
>> which is to say around September.  We might need to re-charter, or we might
>> want to just stay together to handle errata and IETF last call, or we might
>> want to say say we’re done and disband.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>>
>> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
>>
>> IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to