> We checked the draft that the external_secret (optional, string) description is same as Contact.
This was fixed: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/172# discussion_r75344194 On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:26 AM, Andy Ligg <[email protected]> wrote: > We checked the draft that the external_secret (optional, string) > description is same as Contact. > > Another issue we think is how to guarantee this token's security, we plan > to limit this token that it will expire at the short time. Please advise, > thanks. > > Regards, > > Andy > > > On 18 Aug 2016, at 08:58, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Here's one version of what it might look like to add the token Andy > > proposed: > > > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/172 > > > > Let me know what you think! > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
