+1. Removing 'processing' and 'unknown' makes sense to me. I think the remaining statuses are comprehensive enough.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Roland Bracewell Shoemaker < [email protected]> wrote: > Currently the specification defines the statuses 'unknown' and > 'processing' as valid for both applications and authorizations. Given > that both also have 'valid', 'pending', and 'invalid' I can't really see > a reason to keep 'unknown' and for applications in particular the > meaning of 'processing' seems quite similar to 'pending' (whereas with > an authorization I think it makes sense when a validation is actively > being done by the server). > > Any objections to removing these statuses? > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
