Thanks! Any other comments? I'd like to merge this and get to implementing.
On 09/20/2016 12:38 PM, Daniel McCarney wrote: > The simplified verification reads much clearer to me and I think better > matches the intention of the rollover operation, and which key is > performing the authorization. +1 > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/189 > <https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/189> > > Signing with the current account key allows servers to use the same > message > transport authentication that they use for other requests, > simplifying the > verification. > > Also fix two spots where we still described newKey/oldKey as > thumbprints. > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
