Thanks! Any other comments? I'd like to merge this and get to implementing.

On 09/20/2016 12:38 PM, Daniel McCarney wrote:
> The simplified verification reads much clearer to me and I think better
> matches the intention of the rollover operation, and which key is
> performing the authorization. +1
> 
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <j...@eff.org
> <mailto:j...@eff.org>> wrote:
> 
>     https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/189
>     <https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/189>
> 
>     Signing with the current account key allows servers to use the same
>     message
>     transport authentication that they use for other requests,
>     simplifying the
>     verification.
> 
>     Also fix two spots where we still described newKey/oldKey as
>     thumbprints.
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Acme mailing list
>     Acme@ietf.org <mailto:Acme@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> Acme@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
> 

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to