In review, Rich pointed out that some of these are more substantive and should be reviewed as such, so I broke them out into their own PRs:
Remove SCT link relation. https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/234 Specify multi-viewpoint validation. https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/239 Specify server MAY follow HTTP redirects. https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/238 Note: the last one is more of a clarification of current behavior, since HTTP already says "MAY" for redirects. But a lot of ACME implementers have been surprised to hear that redirects are followed, so I think it's important to clarify. On 01/19/2017 11:55 AM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > Hi all, > > I did a top-to-bottom review of the spec to look for coherency (since > we've changed a number of concepts), mistakes, and general consistency. > I filed several pull requests on GitHub: > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/231 > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/232 > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/233 > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/234 > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/235 > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
