> Rumour has it that CAA will soon be a requirement It just passed their balloting so CA/B forum now requires it. See the LAMPS WG thread(s) on CAA erratum 4515.
> The CAA check is/was easy to make and crippling it > by not making it a requirement was IMNSHO a mistake. ... > I urge the WG to reconsider. Does anyone else agree with Viktor? Please speak up on the list this week if so. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
