Hi Niklas, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On 03/13/2017 01:28 PM, Niklas Keller wrote: > 1) https://ietf-wg-acme.github.io/acme/#rfc.section.6.1 > <https://ietf-wg-acme.github.io/acme/#rfc.section.6.1> mentions > "revoke-certificate", while it's called "revoke-cert" in the rest of > the document. I created a PR to change this to match the rest of the document: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/283. > 2) There's "new-account", but the account resource is called "acct", I > think it should be "account" everywhere. We don't gain anything by > saving a few keystrokes / bytes there. The only thing the protocol specifies is the "new-account" name. In the examples, we show the created resource as /acme/acct/1, but it's up to the ACME server what path to use for those. I don't think it's necessary for this name to match. > Maybe we should then also rename "authz" to "authorization" and "cert" > to "certificate" everywhere. I'm not sure the value here is worth the extra changes to clients (though I could be convinced otherwise).
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
