On 03/27/2017 05:30 PM, Roland Bracewell Shoemaker wrote: > The original reason for this was that I held the belief that there was > an RFC that set restrictions on the record types that should exist in > the reverse zones (i.e. PTR/CNAME/NS/SOA) only. After looking through > relevant documents for the last hour though I can't actually find > anything that states this and a number of example zones do seem to > contain other types, notably TXTs.
I think you were probably thinking of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3172: This domain is termed an "infrastructure domain", as its role is to support the operating infrastructure of the Internet. In particular, the "arpa" domain is not to be used in the same manner (e.g., for naming hosts) as other generic Top Level Domains are commonly used. I think Roland's approach is reasonable given the above constraint. Richard, you mentioned this complicates the risk analysis. Could you go into more detail?
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
