I'd be interested in getting draft-shoemaker-acme-ip (current draft: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-shoemaker-acme-ip-00.txt with a revision coming in the very near future) adopted by the WG. We are currently considering implementing the extension defined in it in the Let's Encrypt server software Boulder and it would be good to get consensus from the group that it is an appropriate path forward for validating IP addresses.
Thanks, Roland -- Software Engineer, Let's Encrypt Internet Security Research Group / Linux Foundation On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 7:01 PM Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > Having talked with the authors, we expect the base ACME draft to be ready > for WGLC at least a month before the next IETF meeting. > > > > The CAA document, which we adopted, is very short and straightforward and > seems like it can be handled easily over email. > > > > Does anyone have any new work items that would be ready to discuss in > July? Any rechartering discussion that looks promising? If so, please > post to the mailing list soon. > > > > Thanks, > > Rich and Ted’s Excellent ACME Adventure > > > > > > -- > > Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies > > Member, OpenSSL Dev Team > > IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
