>I would rather sidestep the issue of what format to put the certificate 
>response in, by putting the certificates directly into the JSON ACME order 
>object. I have not seen any arguments against that premise (except for “size”) 
>and several arguments in favor of it.

The "so-called PEM format" is what is accepted by all tooling out there.  And 
if not (JKS) there are well-known tools to adapt it.

We already asked for consensus on this, but I will ask again.  Do people agree 
with Sean?  Please speak up before next Weds.  We had a strong feeling at the 
WG meeting, and scouting the list, I see only a handful of people in favor.

--  
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to