Opening a PR seems like a reasonable thing; you can split it into multiple
PRs if you like, but that's largely a style thing for issues at this scale.

Ted

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Resending, this post seems to have been lost in the noise. Should I open a
> PR? Multiple PRs?
>
> Thanks,
>
>     Yaron
>
>
>
> On 30/05/17 18:52, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>
>> * Order Objects, "authorizations". The text says, "For final orders, the
>> authorizations that were completed." Are we using "completed" to mean
>> "successfully completed"? Maybe we should say so explicitly.
>>
>> * Directory object: not wishing to be drawn into the TOS discussion
>> again, but I think the example would be more useful, if the URL was
>> https://example.com/acme/terms/2017-5-30 instead of
>> https://example.com/acme/terms, because clients can then detect changes
>> more easily.
>>
>> * Changes of Terms of Service: the example is missing the mandatory Link
>> header that's mentioned in the text.
>>
>> * Account key roll-over: the current check #8 is "Check that the “newKey”
>> field of the key-change object also verifies the inner JWS." I think that
>> requiring that "newKey" is bitwise identical to the inner "jwk" is both
>> strictier and more correct.
>>
>> * Account deactivation: shouldn't we also say that all pending Orders
>> MUST be invalidated?
>>
>> * Downloading the Certificate: in the example, the client asks for a
>> single cert (Accept: application/pkix-cert) and receives a chain
>> (application/pem-certificate-chain) - is this legal? This also seems to
>> conflict with the last paragraph of the section.
>>
>> * MIME Type: application/pem-certificate-chain - typo: "Carries a
>> cryptographic certificate" should be "Carries a list of cryptographic
>> certificates"
>>
>> Thanks,
>>     Yaron
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to