At the June 2 interim, we had consensus to adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-acme-star/ as a WG document, subject to splitting It into two documents, the ACME extension in one, and the delegation protocol in another. This corresponds to #1 and #2 in the abstract of the draft.
The authors have agreed to do this. Assuming that the split document is done, are there any objections to adopting *the ACME extensions* as a WG document? Please respond by the end of next week. We will have a separate discussion on the other protocol. -- Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies Member, OpenSSL Dev Team IM: [email protected] Twitter: RichSalz
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
