On 07/18/2017 10:13 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Take a look at the following exchange with Jacob: > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/current/msg02085.html > <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/acme/current/msg02085.html> > > > I think the draft should be clear on the response when the server > reuses existing pending authorization: > 1. Is it still 201 Created? or should it be 200 OK? FWIW, Let's Encrypt is planning to return the exact same code when reusing an existing pending authorization as when creating a new one.
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
