If possible I’d like to give a quick overview of the IP validation draft, the only feedback I’ve received on the last version was editorial unless there is any further thoughts on the technical aspects I’d be interested in seeing if there is consensus for moving this towards LC. Given it’s a pretty simple document this shouldn’t take much time.
> On Oct 29, 2017, at 12:20 PM, Yoav Nir <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/agenda-100-acme/ > > If anything’s missing, please let us know really soon. > > Thanks > > Rich and Yoav > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
