Hi all, I have submitted a few drafts related to the VoIP Service provider challenges. Per the discussions at IETF-99, it was suggested that we consider a generic token mechanism. I have put together an individual draft proposal for that: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barnes-acme-token-challenge/
I also submitted an individual draft showing how that could be used for VoIP Service Providers: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barnes-acme-service-provider-code/ I also made minor changes to the current WG document to address the comment with regards to token lifetimes: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-service-provider/ If we decide to define a generic mechanism, the WG version would be updated along the lines of that 2nd individual draft. Note that in parallel, Jon had put together a proposal for a generic mechanism: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peterson-acme-authority-token/ It's slightly different than my proposal (a little broader), but there are commonalities. I think the focus of discussion in Singapore should be on the proposals for the generic mechanism. Regards, Mary.
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
