Thanks for the review, Martin. I've posted responses in a PR, along with a couple of other minor fixes:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/357 On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Martin Stiemerling <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area review team's > ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written > primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the > document's authors for their information and to allow them to address any > issues raised. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should > consider this review together with any other last-call comments they > receive. Please always CC tsv-art@… if you reply to or forward this > review. > > Summary: > This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be > fixed before publication. > > Editorials: > - Abstract says "DISCLAIMER:...": > This should be removed before publication or there is an issue with the > intended status of Standards Track. > > - A nit, but: section 7.3.4 uses http instead of https in the example: > "instance": "http://example.com/agreement/?token=W8Ih3PswD-8"; > All other instances use https. > > > Technicals: > > - Section 8.2. Retrying challenges > Any guidance on what "some times" means? At least in terms of a time > scale, e.g., seconds, minutes, hours? > > > Thanks for the clearly written document! > > Regards, > > Martin Stiemerling > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
