On 01/07/2018 03:37 PM, Jörn Heissler wrote: > * > https://ietf-wg-acme.github.io/acme/draft-ietf-acme-acme.html#rfc.section.7.3 > says that when an account was created, "The server returns this > account object". > > Should this be the same response that a subsequent POST (empty update, > §7.3.3) to the account URL should yield?
Yes. > > - The example skips the "orders" key which is required (§7.1.2). Whoops, that should be there (though dereferencing the orders URL will get an empty list). > - In the example there's a "Link" header. What's that for? It's a holdover from when almost every response had a link to the directory. It should be removed. > * If the account already exists, what should be returned in the body? > Nothing? Or the full account object? This is answered under 7.3.1. Finding an Account URL Given a Key, but the name probably doesn't make that clear. > * If the account already exists and "onlyReturnExisting" was specified, > what should be returned in the body? Empty body, I think. This should be added to 7.3.1. > * What happens when the account already exists and I send e.g. different > "contact" addresses than there are in the existing account? Will my > account be updated? Yep. > * Should it be allowed to send "onlyReturnExisting" along with other > information, or should those be mutually exclusive? I think these should be mutually exclusive. Would you send a PR with the changes discussed above? _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
