There hasn't been any dissent on-list about this proposal. I'm going to merge the PR.
Thanks all! On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Daniel McCarney <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 - I'm in favour of this change as well. > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Jonathan Rudenberg <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> > On Jan 8, 2018, at 13:37, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > In the course of testing Let's Encrypt's ACME v2 endpoint, we realized >> > that the latest draft specifies "errors" as a plural array on challenges >> > (vs singular "error" for earlier drafts implemented by Boulder and >> > others). However, the ACME spec now also has subproblems as a way to >> > express plural errors (mainly on new-order and finalize). >> > >> > This means we have two different ways to express multiple errors: One >> > for API requests, and one for validation responses. I propose to >> > simplify the spec by using subproblems consistently in both places: >> > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/388 >> >> This change makes sense to me. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
