Hi Daniel, It definitely helps, yes. Would it be sensible to move the common list of parameters there as well, for parity with how the other object types are described?
-Felipe > On Mar 2, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Daniel McCarney <c...@letsencrypt.org> wrote: > > Hi Felipe, > > Does this PR from Richard Barnes address your feedback? > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/399 > > Thanks! > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Felipe Gasper <fel...@felipegasper.com> > wrote: > Hello, > > I’ve been looking over the -09 draft and have created a Perl client > module against Pebble as well as LE’s new testing endpoint. > > I’m curious about whether the specification intends to define > Challenge objects. They appear to exist, of course, but they’re not defined > as objects per se in section 7.1 of the draft. > > Thank you! > > -Felipe Gasper > Mississauga, ON > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme