Hi Daniel,
It definitely helps, yes. Would it be sensible to move the common list
of parameters there as well, for parity with how the other object types are
described?
-Felipe
> On Mar 2, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Daniel McCarney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Does this PR from Richard Barnes address your feedback?
> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/399
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Felipe Gasper <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’ve been looking over the -09 draft and have created a Perl client
> module against Pebble as well as LE’s new testing endpoint.
>
> I’m curious about whether the specification intends to define
> Challenge objects. They appear to exist, of course, but they’re not defined
> as objects per se in section 7.1 of the draft.
>
> Thank you!
>
> -Felipe Gasper
> Mississauga, ON
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
