On 03/04/2018 02:17 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > Hey Joern, > > This is a probably a good thing to have. I think that rather than > putting these in the main spec, it might be better to have them in a > second draft. This is a pretty common pattern. For example, for TLS > 1.3, there's a "test vectors" document separate from the main spec > [0]. There are a few documents with example "call flows" for SIP > [1][2]. ACME is probably somewhere in the middle of those two cases. I agree; the test vectors are a good idea, and should be part of another document.
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
