PR #417 was merged. This should be resolved now.

Thanks again!

- Daniel / cpu

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Daniel McCarney <c...@letsencrypt.org>
wrote:

> Hi Ning,
>
> It seems that the second statement makes more sense, by changing the
>> “pending” into “ready” in the first statement.
>
>
> Agreed, this was an oversight in https://github.com/ietf-wg-
> acme/acme/commit/5da11f713e808bd5c8a707dc67754f5ca37b120e.
>
> I opened a pull request to implement this fix https://github.com/ietf-wg-
> acme/acme/pull/417
>
> Additionally, should the “finalize” URL be made optional in Section 7.1.3,
>> and returned only if the order status is transitioned to “ready”?
>
>
> My preference here is no. This would introduce two ways to check for the
> same thing: whether an order is ready. One by checking the status ==
> "ready" and one by checking if there is a finalizationURL. I think this
> will complicate things without any strong benefits.
>
> Thanks for catching another spec error! :-)
>
> - Daniel / cpu
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Zhang, Ning <Ning.Zhang@team.neustar>
> wrote:
>
>> In Section 7.4, the following two statements seem to in conflict with
>> each other:
>>
>>
>>
>> A request to finalize an order will result in error if the order
>> indicated does not have status “pending”, if the CSR and order identifiers
>> differ, or if the account is not authorized for the identifiers indicated
>> in the CSR.
>>
>> …
>>
>> "ready": The server agrees that the requirements have been fulfilled, and
>> is awaiting finalization.  Submit a finalization request.
>>
>>
>>
>> It seems that the second statement makes more sense, by changing the
>> “pending” into “ready” in the first statement.
>>
>>
>>
>> Additionally, should the “finalize” URL be made optional in Section
>> 7.1.3, and returned only if the order status is transitioned to “ready”?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Ning
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> Acme@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to