* Yes, please ask. If I'm going to tell the IESG that no MTI is needed, I
want to tell them that the WG had consensus.
This came up in the “AD review” thread that many of you have probably just seen
and skimmed or ignored. :)
ACME does not define any mandatory-to-implement signature algorithms. To the
best of my recollection, this has never come up, and Eric reasonably asks that
we not just say “silence gives consensus.”
SO, if anyone feels we should define a set of MTI signature algorithms for
ACME, please speak up now. If you do so, consider proposing what they should
be. Please reply within a week.
Thanks.
/r$, co-chair
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
