Oh, and I don’t think there needs to be any time devoted to either draft as nothing major has been added/changed since the last meeting.
> On Jun 27, 2018, at 2:39 PM, Roland Shoemaker <[email protected]> wrote: > > draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-01: No changes since last meeting other than a > handful of minor editorial changes. The draft method is currently implemented > in the Let’s Encrypt staging environment and is planned to be deployed in the > production environment in the coming weeks. > > draft-ietf-acme-ip-02: The contentious reverse zone DNS based validation > method has been removed from the draft. The document needs a few small > changes to be updated to add guidance on the usage of the TLS-ALPN method > with IP identifiers. > >> On Jun 27, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Can the authors of each draft please send a brief (one or two sentences is >> fine) status to the mailing list about their drafts? Also indicate if you >> want WG time to present, talk about issues, etc. We are scheduled to meet >> during the Tuesday afternoon session, from 17:20-18:20 (last hour, after >> oauth). >> >> draft-ietf-acme-acme-12 >> draft-ietf-acme-caa-05 Ready to move to IESG >> draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-02 >> draft-ietf-acme-email-tls-04 >> draft-ietf-acme-ip-02 >> draft-ietf-acme-star-03 >> draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-01 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
