On 09/05/2018 12:39 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
Using the same notation, I'm:1) "" 2) "urn:ietf:params:acme:get" 99) "{}"
Given that, I'm willing to compromise on "". I think the experience we had of almost implementing bugs with that approach was informative, but isn't decisive.
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
