On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:52 AM Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:

> As WG co-chair, I am not thrilled with making this addition so very very
> late in the process.  If the WG wants to do it, we'd need (a) clear
> consensus and (b) a quick approval from the IESG.
>

Note that since the registration policy is "specification required", doing
this in an extension spec instead would not require the consent of the IESG..



> As an individual, I dislike putting "here's what's wrong with your key" in
> the error message. For example, it encourages a thief to do "venue
> shopping" looking for a CA that will certify their stolen keypair.
>

I think you're confused here, Rich.  This error code relates to *account
keys*, not keys that are certified by the CA.

--Richard



>
> On 1/24/19, 9:27 AM, "Rob Stradling" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     I realize it's very late for making non-editorial changes to
>     draft-ietf-acme-acme, but I'd like to propose adding a new
> badPublicKey
>     error.  This error would be returned by the server whenever it does
> not
>     support, or wishes to reject, a "jwk" public key supplied in a
> client's
>     request.
>
>     Proposed text: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/478
>
>     The 'array of supported "alg" values' in a badSignatureAlgorithm
>     response is useful, but ISTM that it doesn't provide detailed enough
>     information to assist a client in generating a suitable public key.
>
>     (If the consensus is that it's too late to add a new error type, then
> my
>     alternative proposal will be to use "malformed" instead of adding
>     "badPublicKey", but keep the rest of PR 478 as is; I think it's a good
>     idea to call out the need for a server to sanity check each
>     client-supplied public key).
>
>     --
>     Rob Stradling
>     Senior Research & Development Scientist
>     Sectigo Limited
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Acme mailing list
>     [email protected]
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to