On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 09:52:40PM +0100, Hugo Landau wrote: > > I note (and thanks for the heads-up, Ben) that there's new ABNF in > > Section 4 of this version. I have a DISCUSS-level question on it. > > > > The ABNF allows for the value of "validationmethods" to be empty, but > > the first paragraph of Section 4 says, "The value of this parameter, > > if specified, MUST be a comma-separated string of validation method > > labels," which implies that it can't be empty. > > > > Which is intended? If it's mean to be allowed to be empty, please > > change the text to make that clear. If not, then please remove the > > square-brackets on the ABNF for "value"; that will make it require at > > least one label. > By "string of validation method labels", I meant zero or more. I'll > amend it to clarify this. Pushed to repo [1]. I'll push a new I-D in an hour or two barring any objections.
[1] https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme-caa/commit/283efb4a76eaccf320243e1f395a211dd8737472 _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
