Hi Adam, Thank you very much for your review.
On 02/10/2019, 02:22, "Adam Roach via Datatracker" <[email protected]> wrote: > ยง3.3: > > > o Intermediaries MAY insert or delete the value, but MUST ensure > > that if present, the header value equals the corresponding > > value within the credential. > > This probably isn't what you want to say. Read literally, this imposes > a requirements on intermediaries who are neither removing nor adding > these header fields to validate that they match the value in the > certs. That's clearly an unrealistic expectation. I suspect the > intention here is that any entity who inserts a value must ensure that > the newly inserted value matches the corresponding value in the > certificate. Indeed, good catch. This and the rest of your comments have been incorporated in [1]. BTW, IESG feedback is being cumulatively processed here [2]. Cheers, thanks! [1] https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/commit/1c8682a8e22db63dca199dc62979f516f11b975e [2] https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/compare/acme-star-iesg-processing?expand=1 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
