The IESG are considering the options and will let us know. The intent is still to have a week of virtual meetings.
After that ACME can decide if we’re participating in that, or making our own virtual interim a few weeks later. > On 10 Mar 2020, at 22:21, Mary Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, I thought it was a possibility to have the week consist of all virtual > meetings. Or has that been totally removed from the table? Some of us like > that option as we've already blocked that week in our calendars. > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 3:07 PM Yoav Nir <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On 9 Mar 2020, at 17:11, Salz, Rich <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Yaron and I cannot attend and will be remote. We have volunteers to act as > > chairs for us (on CC). Looking at the list below, it seems reasonable to > > cancel our session. PLEASE POST IF YOU DISAGREE. Of course "they" may > > decide to cancel anyway, but please post your opinion here. > > As it turns out, this decision has been made for us, as the entire meeting > has been cancelled. > > We will discuss on this list whether, when, and in what format we are > planning on having a virtual meeting to replace the physical one. > > See you all around, physically or virtually > > Rich and Yoav >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
