On 25/06/2020 19:48, Roman Danyliw wrote:
Hi Alexey!
-----Original Message-----
From: Acme <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 11:38 AM
To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>; IETF ACME <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Acme] AD Review of draft-ietf-acme-email-smime-07
Hi Roman,
On 22/05/2020 15:54, Roman Danyliw wrote:
[snip]
** Section 7. Per "Any claims about the correctness or fitness-for-purpose
of the email address must be otherwise assured", I don't follow the intent of
this text. For example, what is the "correctness ... of the email address"?
What
is meant by "assurances"?
This was based on feedback from one of reviewers. It is basically saying
that issued ACME certificates don't vouch for anything other than "this
email seems to belong to the entity that requested it". Does this make
sense?
This cautionary clarification makes more sense to me. Can you fold in some
language to that effect into a revision.
Given that this is the last of that changes, this update can be made with other
IETF LC feedback.
Ok, I will do this in -09.
Thanks,
Roman
Best Regards,
Alexey
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
