Document: draft-friel-acme-subdomains-02
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Date: 2020-08-04
Major Concern:
The TODO markers regarding wildcard domain names, the 200 response
code, and the security considerations should be filled in with
strawman text before this I-D is adopted by the ACME WG.
Minor Concerns:
General: s/certificate authority/certification authority/ (many)
Abstract: s/certificate authority policy/certificate policy/
Introduction: s/X.509 (PKIX)/X.509v3 (PKIX) [RFC5280]/
Terminology: Correct CA, please. See above.
Terminology: Please add a definition of subdomain.
Nits:
Section 3: says:
3. client sends POST-as-GET requests to retrieve the
"authorizations", with the downloaded "authorization" object(s)
containing the "identifier" that the client must prove control of
s/client must prove control of/client must prove that they control/
There is something wrong with the table formatting in Section 6.2.
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
