Russ Housley <[email protected]> wrote: > MAJOR: > Sections 3, 4, 5, and 7.2 seem to have a misunderstanding of EST CSR > Attrs, which were recently explained by Dan Harkins on the LAMPS WG > mail list:
In light of this, I agree. We will have to figure out how to communicate to the client/pledge the desired subjectAltName. This part is inherited from RFC8995. In the meantime, do you have any other major comments/concerns? -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
