Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist-08: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-authority-token-tnauthlist/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A couple of easy but necessary ones: Please use the correct BCP 14 boilerplate in Section 2, and I believe those references need to be normative. Also, I think this document, like draft-ietf-acme-authority-token, needs a normative reference to RFC 4648 if it's going to use base64url(). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you to Sean Turner for the ARTART review. I support Francesca's DISCUSS. The shepherd writeup appears to be confused with the one for draft-ietf-acme-authority-token. This one has the abstract for that one, for example. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
