All, This last editorial change adds (aside) paragraphs to explain the experimental nature of different aspects of the validation mechanism, updates references to now-published RFCs, and fixes the examples to properly contain the algorithm identifier structures. I believe that this addresses all comments received so far, so the document is ready for WGLC and further progression. Thanks, Brian S.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 10:26 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Automated Certificate Management > Environment WG of the IETF. > > Title : Automated Certificate Management Environment > (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension > Author : Brian Sipos > Filename : draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10.txt > Pages : 32 > Date : 2022-09-11 > > Abstract: > This document specifies an extension to the Automated Certificate > Management Environment (ACME) protocol which allows an ACME server to > validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID for an ACME > client. The DTN Node ID is encoded as a certificate Subject > Alternative Name (SAN) of type otherName with a name form of > BundleEID and as an ACME Identifier type "bundleEID". > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org: > :internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
