As this is already binding classification for TLS certificate industry,
It's natural to use this classifiaction for CAA records for set CAA
record of validation, but not sure this kind of one-liner document will fly:
"validationmethod lable br-N means it allows cerficiate validation
method 3.2.2.4.N in CA/B
BR(https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/)"
the problem I see already:
1. too short.
2. it just pushes to look at 3rd party document outside of ietf control
3. while this is ammendment for rfc from acme working group this itself
will make entire document outside scope of acme (lamps working group
would be better suited, where CAA itself is from)
wonder if it better contect CA.B forum and ask to build one on their
side or so be better?
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
