I've read the draft and think it's a valuable addition for the ACME ecosystem.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 9:11 AM Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > I have read the draft, and it seems well thought through. Especially if > there is implementor interest, this seems like a sane thing for the WG to > adopt. > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:53 PM Carl Wallace <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I’ve read the draft and support its adoption. >> >> >> >> *From: *Acme <[email protected]> on behalf of Deb Cooley < >> [email protected]> >> *Date: *Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 1:01 PM >> *To: *IETF ACME <[email protected]> >> *Cc: *<[email protected]> >> *Subject: *[Acme] Call for adoption for draft-bweeks-acme-device-attest >> >> >> >> This will be a three week call for adoption ending on 6 Dec. (because of >> holidays in the US). Please speak up either for or against adopting this >> draft. >> >> Thanks, >> Deb and Yoav. >> >> _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list >> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> _______________________________________________ >> Acme mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >> > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
