> RFC8555 already addresses wildcards, no?
Yes, wildcards are suppoted in RFC8555.
Meanwhile, there are no mentions of wildcards in draft-ietf-acme-subdomains-06.
It seems that wildcard certificates are not suitable for the subdomain scenario.
However, I think the wildcard certificate is another candidate for subdomain 
manegement.
Thus, I am wondering the reason why no wildcard certificates are mentioned in 
the draft.
Are there some reasons for wildcard certificates cannot be used in subdomain 
scenarios?

Regards,

Lei YAN

发件人: Acme <[email protected]> 代表 Deb Cooley
发送时间: 2023年2月4日 21:32
收件人: Yanlei(Ray) <[email protected]>; [email protected]
抄送: Dorothy E Cooley <[email protected]>
主题: Re: [Acme] Comment on draft-ietf-acme-subdomains-06: How about using 
wildcard certificates for subdomains?

RFC8555 already addresses wildcards, no?

Deb Cooley
ACME chair
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:11 AM Yanlei(Ray) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

Hi,



I'm new to this group and sorry for the late comment. I just saw this draft and 
have an idea after reading. I'd like to know from you experts whether it's 
reasonable.



The illustration in Section 5 uses Subject Alternative Name (SAN) to list every 
subdomain name in a certificate.

I wonder if this mechanism can be replaced by using a wildcard certificate?

Compared with using the Subject Alternative Name (SAN), a wildcard certificate 
can simplify the complexity and reduce the costs for securing a number of 
subdomains.

As the sub-domain name changes, the client with SAN has to re-apply its 
certificate, but the client with wildcard certificate does not need to change 
its certificate.

I think wildcard certificates have been commonly used in subdomains management.

As illustrated in Section 5:

  +--------+                  +------+     +-----+

  | Client |                  | ACME |     | DNS |

  +---+----+                  +---+--+     +--+--+

      |                            |            |

    STEP 1: Pre-Authorization of ancestor domain

      |               .            |            |

      |               .            |            |

      |               .            |            |

    STEP 2: Place order for sub1.example.org<http://sub1.example.org>

      |               .            |            |

      |               .            |            |

      |               .            |            |

    STEP 3: Place order for sub2.example.org<http://sub2.example.org>.

      |               .            |            |

      |               .            |            |

      |               .            |            |



If there are multiple subdomains, the client has to place an order multiple 
times for every subdomain.

If using a wildcard certificate, the client only needs to place an order once 
for the wildcard certificate.

Then the client can configure its subdomain servers with the same wildcard 
certificate.

  +--------+                  +------+     +-----+

  | Client |                  | ACME |     | DNS |

  +---+----+                  +---+--+     +--+--+

      |                            |            |

    STEP 1: Pre-Authorization of ancestor domain

      |               .            |            |

      |               .            |            |

      |               .            |            |

    STEP 2: Place order for *.example.org<http://example.org>    |

      |                            |            |





This is just a preliminary idea, and please correct me if I'm thinking wrongly.



Regards,

Lei YAN
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to