Oops missed those, will get a draft-16 out to address those nits. -----Original Message----- From: John Scudder via Datatracker <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2023 5:33 PM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-integrations-15: (with COMMENT)
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-integrations-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-integrations/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS. ## NITS "Roots CAs" -> "Root CAs"? "The EST Registration Authority (RA) is configured with the DNS domain which it will issue certificates." That should be "for which", right? ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
