Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote: > This is the beginning of a two week WGLC for this draft, which will end on > 26 Jan. > > Please review and comment.
I read it, and would not object to it being published as independent submission. But, I never object to publishing anything. I do not think it represents IETF consensus, even as an experimental work. It can't. That's because it makes some claims that can't be supported in a network protocol. This is just one: "An integrity gateway SHALL validate the Source Node ID of a bundle, using local-network-specific means, before adding a BIB to the bundle. The exact means by which an integrity gateway validates a bundle's source is network-specific, but could use physical-layer, network-layer or BP-convergence-layer authentication. The bundle source could also add its own BIB with a local-network-specific security context or local-network-specific key material (i.e. a group key shared within the local network)." thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
