Deb,

I've been puttering with an ACME extension for supporting IoT devices like 
printers for a while not - I presented it to the IoT Ops WG last year and there 
was enough interest to at least keep working on the issues, but it would 
definitely benefit from the ACME work group looking at it as well...

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sweet-iot-acme/

If it matters, I'd be presenting remotely...


> On Mar 7, 2024, at 7:30 AM, Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> This is what I have currently.  We have a 90 min time slot (no idea why), so 
> there is time to talk about other work/drafts.  I'm happy to make updates.
> 
> Deb
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Automated Certificate Management Environment (acme)
> 
> IETF 119, Thursday, 21 March 2024 1530-1700 (AUS Eastern Time  (0530-0700 
> UTC) , Room: M1
> 
> Preliminary Agenda
> 
> Note Well, technical difficulties and administrivia (chairs) – 10 min
> 
> Document Status (chairs) – 10 min
> 
> Work items
> 
>  - draft-ietf-ari (Gable) - 10 min
>  - draft-acme-device-attest (Weeks) - 10 min
>  - draft-ietf-acme-onion (Misell - remote) - 10 min
>  - draft-vanbrouwershaven-acme-auto-discovery and 
>  - draft-vanbrouwershaver-acme-client-discovery (vanBrouwershaven, Ounsworth) 
> - 15 min
> 
> AOB - 25 mins
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Acme mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

________________________
Michael Sweet

_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to