Chairs, The DTN Node ID validation document [1] is about to expire but its companion document [2] in the DTN WG just passed IESG review along with some editorial comments from IANA. To keep the ACME document alive I am going to update it with those IANA terminology fixes but not change the normative content of the draft. With the companion document now passed IESG review I think the ACME draft is also ready for IESG review and can be "unstuck" from its current holding pattern. Does this sound like a good plan?
Thanks, Brian S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dtn-bpv7-admin-iana/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
